Repeated Moral Hazard with Boundedly Rational Agents
نویسنده
چکیده
In this paper we consider a situation where a number of identical myopic agents enter a long term contract with a principal. The actions of the agents cannot be observed, and the principal ooers the agents a payment scheme where payments from the principal to the agents are based on the observable outcome in the corresponding period. Whereas the principal knows the distribution of outcomes, given the level of eeort agents invest, agents do not have perfect knowledge of this distribution. They have initial beliefs about the induced distributions and adapt these beliefs dynamically using a simple updating rule. The principal tries to optimize his discounted expected payoo by taking into account the agents expected learning behavior. It is shown that an intertemporally optimal incentive scheme exists in this setup and optimal schemes for all possible constellations of agents' initial beliefs are characterized. Further, it is shown how the optimal scheme changes if the principal is uncertain about the agents initial beliefs.
منابع مشابه
Uncertain Acts in Games
This text reviews a recent approach to modeling “radically uncertain” behavior in strategic interactions. By rigorously rooting the approach in decision theory, we provide a foundation for applications of Knightian uncertainty in mechanism design, principal agent and moral hazard models. We discuss critical assessments and provide alternative interpretations of the new equilibria in terms of eq...
متن کامل1 MORAL - HAZARD CREDIT CYCLES WITH RISK - AVERSE AGENTS by Roger
MORAL-HAZARD CREDIT CYCLES WITH RISK-AVERSE AGENTS by Roger B. Myerson http://home.uchicago.edu/~rmyerson/research/rabankers.pdf Abstract: We consider a simple overlapping-generations model with risk-averse financial agents subject to moral hazard. Efficient contracts for such financial intermediaries involve backloaded late-career rewards. Compared to the analogous model with risk-neutral agen...
متن کاملBounded Rationality in Repeated Games∗
Models of bounded rationality often lead to sharper predictions about real world outcomes than their full rationality counterparts. Full rationality in repeated interactions allows a plethora of equilibrium outcomes. In this paper, I examine the effect of bounded rationality in infinitely repeated games. In particular, does the introduction of boundedly rational agents lead to a smaller set of ...
متن کاملCodification schemes and finite automata
This paper is a note on how Information Theory and Codification Theory are helpful in the computational design both of communication protocols and strategy sets in the framework of finitely repeated games played by boundedly rational agents. More precisely, we show the usefulness of both theories to improve the existing automata bounds of Neyman’s (1998) work on finitely repeated games played b...
متن کاملIncentive Design in Peer Review: Rating and Repeated Endogenous Matching
Peer review (e.g., grading assignments in Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs), academic paper review) is an effective and scalable method to evaluate the products (e.g., assignments, papers) of a large number of agents when the number of reviewing experts (e.g., teaching assistants, editors) is limited. Peer review poses two key challenges: 1) identifying the reviewers intrinsic capabilities (i...
متن کامل